Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCampanella, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorAbsil, Julie
dc.contributor.authorCarbia Sinde, Carina
dc.contributor.authorSchroder, Elisa
dc.contributor.authorPeigneux, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorBourguignon, Mathieu
dc.contributor.authorPetieau, Mathieu
dc.contributor.authorMetens, Thierry
dc.contributor.authorNouali, Mustapha
dc.contributor.authorGoldman, Serge
dc.contributor.authorCheron, Guy
dc.contributor.authorVerbanck, Paul
dc.contributor.authorDe Tiège, Xavier
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-05T11:25:44Z
dc.date.available2018-03-05T11:25:44Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationCampanella, S., Absil, J., Carbia Sinde, C. et al. Brain Imaging and Behavior (2017) 11: 1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-016-9654-yes_ES
dc.identifier.issn1931-7557
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/25449
dc.descriptionFirst Online: 10 November 2016es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe ability to suppress responses that are inappropriate, as well as the mechanisms monitoring the accuracy of actions in order to compensate for errors, is central to human behavior. Neural alterations that prevent stopping an inaccurate response, combined with a decreased ability of error monitoring, are considered to be prominent features of alcohol abuse. Moreover, (i) alterations of these processes have been reported in heavy social drinkers (i.e. young healthy individuals who do not yet exhibit a state of alcohol dependence); and (ii) through longitudinal studies, these alterations have been shown to underlie subsequent disinhibition that may lead to future alcohol use disorders. In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging study, using a contextual Go/No-Go task, we investigated whether different neural networks subtended correct inhibitions and monitoring mechanisms of failed inhibitory trials in light versus heavy social drinkers. We show that, although successful inhibition did not lead to significant changes, neural networks involved in error monitoring are different in light versus heavy drinkers. Thus, while light drinkers exhibited activations in their right inferior frontal, right middle cingulate and left superior temporal areas; heavy drinkers exhibited activations in their right cerebellum, left caudate nucleus, left superior occipital region, and left amygdala. These data are functionally interpreted as reflecting a “visually-driven emotional strategy” vs. an “executive-based” neural response to errors in heavy and light drinkers, respectively. Such a difference is interpreted as a key-factor that may subtend the transition from a controlled social heavy consumption to a state of clinical alcohol dependence.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSalvatore Campanella is Research Associate at the Fund of Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS, Belgium). Mathieu Bourguignon benefits of a research grant from the FRIA (FRS-FNRS, Belgium). Xavier De Tiège is “Postdoctorate Clinical Master Specialist” at the Fund of Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS, Belgium).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBrain Imaging and Behaviores_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectSocial drinkinges_ES
dc.subjectAlcoholes_ES
dc.subjectFunctional magnetic resonance imaginges_ES
dc.subjectGo/No-Go taskes_ES
dc.subjectCognitive controles_ES
dc.subjectError awarenesses_ES
dc.titleNeural correlates of correct and failed response inhibition in heavy versus light social drinkers: an fMRI study during a go/no-go task by healthy participantses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/journal/11682es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11682-016-9654-y


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record