Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArteagoitia Calvo, María Iciar ORCID
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Andrés, Carlos ORCID
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Eva
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-05T11:50:55Z
dc.date.available2018-07-05T11:50:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-23
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE 13(4) : (2017) // Article ID e0195592es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/27916
dc.description.abstractBackground and aims Scientific evidence is not clear regarding the use of antimicrobial mouth rinse before dental extraction to reduce bacteremia. We tested the null hypothesis that there would be no difference in the incidence of bacteremia following dental extractions in patients treated with or without chlorhexidine. Material and methods We conducted a meta-analysis following the recommendations proposed by PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The data sources Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, and Ovid MD were searched until April 30, 2017. (chlorhexidine) AND (bacteremia OR bacteraemia) AND (extraction OR removal) were used as key words in a free-text search. Published meeting abstracts were searched. The references of each article were reviewed. We only included randomized controlled clinical trials. There were no restrictions regarding language or date of publication. The outcome measure was the incidence of the bacteremia measured within the first ten minutes post-extraction. Two reviewers independently undertook the risk of bias assessment and data extraction. A fixed-effects inverse variance weighted meta-analysis was conducted. Results Out of 18 studies, eight eligible trials with 523 participants were selected, 267 in the experimental group and 256 in the control group: risk ratio = 0.882 (95% confidence interval 0.799 to 0.975; p = 0.014), heterogeneity I-2 = 13.07%, and p = 0.33. The number needed to treat was 16 (95% CI 7-Infinity). Conclusions Approximately 12% of bacteremia cases can be prevented if a population is exposed to chlorhexidine. CRD42016046586.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPublic Library Sciencees_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectdouble-blindes_ES
dc.subjectmouthrinsees_ES
dc.subjectpreventiones_ES
dc.subjectamoxicillines_ES
dc.subjectmouthwashes_ES
dc.subjectplaceboes_ES
dc.subjectriskes_ES
dc.titleDoes chlorhexidine reduce bacteremia following tooth extraction? A systematic review and meta-analysises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2018 Arteagoitia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195592es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0195592
dc.departamentoesMedicina preventiva y salud públicaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuPrebentzio medikuntza eta osasun publikoaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2018 Arteagoitia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2018 Arteagoitia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.