UPV-EHU ADDI
  • Itzuli
    • English
    • Español
    • Euskera
  • Nire Dspace
  • Euskera 
    • English
    • Español
    • Euskera
  • FAQ
Itemaren erregistro erraza erakusten du 
  •   Hasiera
  • Ikerketarako Taldeak, Institutuak eta Gune Kolaboratzaileak
  • IKERKUNTZA
  • BCBL
  • BCBL-Publications
  • Itemaren erregistro erraza erakusten du
  •   Hasiera
  • Ikerketarako Taldeak, Institutuak eta Gune Kolaboratzaileak
  • IKERKUNTZA
  • BCBL
  • BCBL-Publications
  • Itemaren erregistro erraza erakusten du
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparing Semantic Fluency in American Sign Language and English

Thumbnail
Ikusi/Ireki
Comparing semantic fluency2018.pdf (451.1Kb)
Data
2018
Egilea
Sevcikova Sehyr, Zed
Giezen, Marcel R.
Emmorey, Karen
Metadata
Itemaren Dublin Core erregistro osoa erakusten du
Zed Sevcikova Sehyr, Marcel R Giezen, Karen Emmorey; Comparing Semantic Fluency in American Sign Language and English, The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, Volume 23, Issue 4, 1 October 2018, Pages 399–407, https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eny013
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10810/28942
Laburpena
This study investigated the impact of language modality and age of acquisition on semantic fluency in American Sign Language (ASL) and English. Experiment 1 compared semantic fluency performance (e.g., name as many animals as possible in one minute) for deaf native and early ASL signers and hearing monolingual English speakers. The results showed similar fluency scores in both modalities when fingerspelled responses were included for ASL. Experiment 2 compared ASL and English fluency scores in hearing native and late ASL-English bilinguals. Semantic fluency scores were higher in English (the dominant language) than ASL (the non-dominant language), regardless of age of ASL acquisition. Fingerspelling was relatively common in all groups of signers and was used primarily for low-frequency items. We conclude that semantic fluency is sensitive to language dominance and that performance can be compared across the spoken and signed modality, but fingerspelled responses should be included in ASL fluency scores.
Collections
  • BCBL-Publications

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
OpenAIRE
OpenAIRE
 

 

Zerrendatu honako honen arabera

Gordailu osoaKomunitateak & bildumakArgitalpen dataren araberaEgileakIzenburuakDepartamentos (cas.)Departamentos (eus.)MateriakBilduma hauArgitalpen dataren araberaEgileakIzenburuakDepartamentos (cas.)Departamentos (eus.)Materiak

Nire kontua

Sartu

Estatistikak

Ikusi erabilearen inguruko estatistikak

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
OpenAIRE
OpenAIRE