Differences in the Use and Opinions About New eHealth Technologies Among Patients With Psychosis: Structured Questionnaire
dc.contributor.author | Bonet, Lucia | |
dc.contributor.author | Llácer, Blanca | |
dc.contributor.author | Hernandez-Viadel, Miguel | |
dc.contributor.author | Arce, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Blanquer, Ignacio | |
dc.contributor.author | Cañete, Carlos | |
dc.contributor.author | Escartí, Maria | |
dc.contributor.author | González Pinto Arrillaga, Ana María | |
dc.contributor.author | Sanjuán, Julio | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-22T13:39:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-22T13:39:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-07-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | JMIR Mental Health 5(2) : (2018) // Article ID UNSP e51 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 2368-7959 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/29747 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Despite a growing interest in the use of technology in order to support the treatment of psychotic disorders, limited knowledge exists about the viability and acceptability of these eHealth interventions in relation to the clinical characteristics of patients. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the access and use of, as well as experiences and interest in, new technologies using a survey of patients diagnosed with early psychosis compared with a survey of patients diagnosed with chronic psychotic disorders. Methods: We designed a structured questionnaire This questionnaire was divided into five parts: (1) clinical and demographic information, (2) access and use of the internet, (3) use of the internet in relation to mental health, (4) experiences with technology, and (5) patients' interest in eHealth services. In total, 105 patients were recruited from early psychosis units (n=65) and recovery units (n=40). Results: In this study, 84.8% (89/105) of the patients had access to the internet and 88.6% (93/105) owned an electronic internet device. In total, 71.3% (57/80) of patients who owned a mobile phone were interested in eHealth systems and 38.2% (37/97) reported negative experiences related to the internet usage. We observed differences between the groups in terms of device ownership (P=.02), the frequency of internet access (P<.001), the use of social media (P=.01), and seeking health information (P=.04); the differences were found to be higher in the early psychosis group. No differences were found between the groups in terms of the use of internet in relation to mental health, experiences and opinions about the internet, or interest in eHealth interventions (P=.43). Conclusions: The availability and use of technology for the participants in our survey were equivalent to those for the general population. The differences found between the groups in relation to the access or use of technology seemed to due to age-related factors. The use of technology involving mental health and the interest in eHealth interventions were mainly positive and equivalent between the groups. Accordingly, this group of patients is a potential target for the emerging eHealth interventions, regardless of their clinical status. However, 28.7% (23/80) of the studied patients rejected the use of internet interventions and 38.2% (37/97) had unpleasant experiences related to its usage; thus, more in-depth studies are needed to better define the profile of patients with psychosis who may benefit from eHealth treatments. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This study was supported by Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO/2016/082 grant) and CIBERSAM and Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria (PI01399, PI13/00447; PI17/00402, Cofunded FEDER). | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | JMIR Publications | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject | eHealth | es_ES |
dc.subject | internet | es_ES |
dc.subject | mobile phone | es_ES |
dc.subject | viability | es_ES |
dc.subject | acceptability | es_ES |
dc.subject | psychosis | es_ES |
dc.subject | schizophrenia | es_ES |
dc.subject | internet use | es_ES |
dc.subject | mental-illness | es_ES |
dc.subject | schizophrenia | es_ES |
dc.subject | people | es_ES |
dc.subject | metaanalysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | phone | es_ES |
dc.subject | intervention | es_ES |
dc.subject | information | es_ES |
dc.subject | media | es_ES |
dc.title | Differences in the Use and Opinions About New eHealth Technologies Among Patients With Psychosis: Structured Questionnaire | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | Lucia Bonet, Blanca Llácer, Miguel Hernandez-Viadel, David Arce, Ignacio Blanquer, Carlos Cañete, Maria Escartí, Ana M González-Pinto, Julio Sanjuán. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 25.07.2018. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | Atribución 3.0 España | * |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://mental.jmir.org/2018/3/e51/ | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2196/mental.9950 | |
dc.departamentoes | Neurociencias | es_ES |
dc.departamentoeu | Neurozientziak | es_ES |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Lucia Bonet, Blanca Llácer, Miguel Hernandez-Viadel, David Arce, Ignacio Blanquer, Carlos Cañete, Maria Escartí, Ana M González-Pinto, Julio Sanjuán. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 25.07.2018.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.