Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGonçalves-Pereira, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Fraile, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorSantos Zorrozúa, Borja ORCID
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Carrasco, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Catalina, Paola
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez-Panchón, Ana I.
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz-Hermoso, Paula
dc.contributor.authorBallesteros Rodríguez, Francisco Javier ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-05T11:46:02Z
dc.date.available2019-04-05T11:46:02Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-05
dc.identifier.citationHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes 15 : (2017) // Article ID 63es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1477-7525
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/32355
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Zarit Burden Interview ( ZBI) was originally developed to assess the level of subjective burden in caregivers of people with dementia. The Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire ( IEQ) is amongst the leading scales to assess caregiving consequences in severe mental illness. We aimed to compare the psychometric properties of the ZBI, a generic tool, and of the IEQ, a more specific tool to assess the consequences of caregiving in schizophrenia and related disorders. Methods: Secondary analyses of a 16- week, randomized controlled trial of a psychoeducational intervention in 223 primary caregivers of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Psychometric properties ( internal consistency, convergent and discriminative validity, and sensitivity to change) were evaluated for both ZBI and IEQ. Results: Internal consistency was good and similar for both scales ( ZBI: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.89, 0.94; IEQ: 0.86, 95% CI: 0. 83, 0.89). Convergent validity was relevant for similar domains ( e. g. ZBI total score vs IEQ- tension r = 0.69, 95% CI: 0. 61, 0.75) and at least moderate for the rest of domains ( ZBI total score, personal strain and role strain vs IEQ- urging and supervision). Discriminative validity against psychological distress and depressive symptoms was good ( Area Under the Curve [ AUC]: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.83; and 0.69, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.78 - for ZBI against GHQ- 28 and CES- D respectively; and AUC: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.78; and 0.69, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.77 - for IEQ against GHQ- 28 and CES- D respectively). AUCs against the reference criteria did not differ significantly between the two scales. After the intervention, both scales showed a significant decrease at endpoint ( p- values < 0.001) with similar standardised effect sizes for change (- 0.36, 95% CI: - 0.58, - 0.15 - for ZBI; - 0.39, 95% CI: - 0.60, - 0.18 - for IEQ). Conclusions: Both ZBI and IEQ have shown satisfactory psychometric properties to assess caregiver burden in this sample. We provided further evidence on the performance of the ZBI as a general measure of subjective burden.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was entirely funded by a public research grant (FIS PI10/01049, Spain).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBiomed Centrales_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectpsychometricses_ES
dc.subjectcaregiverses_ES
dc.subjectschizophreniaes_ES
dc.subjectcommunityes_ES
dc.subjectcost of illnesses_ES
dc.subjectgeneral health questionnairees_ES
dc.subjectscale ces-des_ES
dc.subjectpsychoeducational interventiones_ES
dc.subjectmental-illnesses_ES
dc.subjectschizophrenic-patientes_ES
dc.subjectspanish populationes_ES
dc.subjectfamily caregiverses_ES
dc.subjectrandomized-triales_ES
dc.subjectbrain-injuryes_ES
dc.subjectfollow-upes_ES
dc.titleAssessment of the consequences of caregiving in psychosis: a psychometric comparison of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and the Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire (IEQ)es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holderThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12955-017-0626-8es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12955-017-0626-8
dc.departamentoesMedicinaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuMedikuntzaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.