Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMorera, Yurena
dc.contributor.authorvan der Meij, Maartje
dc.contributor.authorde Vega, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorBarber, Horacio A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-16T11:04:49Z
dc.date.available2019-05-16T11:04:49Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationMorera Y, van der Meij M, de Vega M and Barber HA (2019) Are Sensory-Motor Relationships Encoded ad hoc or by Default?: An ERP Study. Front. Psychol. 10:966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00966es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/32828
dc.descriptionPublished: 03 May 2019es_ES
dc.description.abstractIn this event-related potentials study we tested whether sensory-motor relations between concrete words are encoded by default or only under explicit ad hoc instructions. In Exp. 1, participants were explicitly asked to encode sensory-motor relations (e.g., “do the following objects fit in a pencil-cup?”), while other possible semantic relations remained implicit. In Exp. 2, using the same materials other group of participants were explicitly asked to encode semantic relations (e.g., “are the following objects related to a pencil-cup?”), and the possible sensory-motor relations remained implicit. The N400 component was sensitive to semantic relations (e.g., “desk” related to “pencil-cup”) both under implicit (Exp. 1) and explicit instructions (Exp. 2). By contrast, most sensory-motor relations (e.g., “pea” fitting in “pencil-cup”) were encoded ad hoc under explicit instructions (Exp. 1). Interestingly some sensory-motor relations were also encoded implicitly, but only when they corresponded to “functional” actions associated with high-related objects (e.g., “eraser” fitting in “pencil-cup”) and occurring at a late time window (500–650 ms; Exp. 2), suggesting that this type of sensory-motor relations were encoding by default.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the Spanish MINECO (Grant Nos. PSI2015-66277-R to MdV and PSI2016-79624-P to HB) and the European Regional Development Funds.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers in Psychologyes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/PSI2015-66277-Res_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/PSI2016-79624-Pes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectsemanticses_ES
dc.subjectad hoc categorieses_ES
dc.subjectaffordanceses_ES
dc.subjectfunctional relationses_ES
dc.subjectN400es_ES
dc.titleAre Sensory-Motor Relationships Encoded ad hoc or by Default?: An ERP Studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2019 Morera, van der Meij, de Vega and Barber. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology#es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00966


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record