Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartínez de la Hidalga Malla, Gillen ORCID
dc.contributor.authorZawiszewski, Adam ORCID
dc.contributor.authorLaka Mugarza, Itziar ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-28T09:24:58Z
dc.date.available2020-02-28T09:24:58Z
dc.date.issued2019-11
dc.identifier.citationGlossa-A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1) : (2019) // Article ID 120es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2397-1835
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/41847
dc.description.abstractThe Unaccusative Hypothesis (UH) has been extensively studied in linguistics, but, to date, it has not been tested by means of ERPs. The present study aimed to experimentally test the UH hypothesis in Basque and determine what the electrophysiological correlates are of the processing of unergative versus unaccusative predicates; it also aimed to investigate distinctness in phi-feature processing. We generated eight conditions to compare unergative and unaccusative predicate sentence processing involving phi-feature violations in grammatical and ungrammatical sentences. Participants responded faster to sentences containing unaccusative predicates compared to unergative predicates. All conditions elicited a N400-P600 interaction. Overall, the negativity elicited by person violations was larger than the negativity elicited by number violations in both types of predicates. Intransitives differed regarding the size of the positivity elicited by phi-feature violations: unaccusatives elicited a larger positivity for number than for person feature violations, but unergatives elicited a larger positivity for person than for number.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research has been supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Grant No. BES-2016-076456, FFI2014-55733-P and FFI2015-64183-P) and the Basque Government (IT665-13).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherUbiquity Presses_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/BES-2016-076456es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/FFI2014-55733-Pes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/FFI2015-64183-Pes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectERPses_ES
dc.subjectunaccusative hypothesises_ES
dc.subjectsubject agreementes_ES
dc.subjectperson and number phi featureses_ES
dc.subjectBasquees_ES
dc.subjectverb agreementes_ES
dc.subjectbrain potentialses_ES
dc.subjectcomprehensiones_ES
dc.subjectcomplexityes_ES
dc.subjectsentenceses_ES
dc.subjectnumberes_ES
dc.subjectobjectes_ES
dc.titleEppur non si muove: Experimental evidence for the Unaccusative Hypothesis and distinct ɸ-feature processing in Basquees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder2019 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.glossa-journal.org/article/10.5334/gjgl.829/es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/gjgl.829
dc.contributor.funderMartinez de la Hidalga, Gillen
dc.departamentoesLingüística y estudios vascoses_ES
dc.departamentoeuHizkuntzalaritza eta euskal ikasketakes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

2019 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as 2019 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.