Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVandermosten, Maaike
dc.contributor.authorCorreia, João M.
dc.contributor.authorVanderauwera, Jolijn
dc.contributor.authorWouters, Jan
dc.contributor.authorBonte, Milene
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T12:00:22Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T12:00:22Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationVandermosten, M, Correia, J, Vanderauwera, J, Wouters, J, Ghesquière, P, Bonte, M. Brain activity patterns of phonemic representations are atypical in beginning readers with family risk for dyslexia. Dev Sci. 2020; 23:e12857. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12857es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1363-755X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/42372
dc.descriptionVersion of Record online: 21 June 2019es_ES
dc.description.abstractThere is an ongoing debate whether phonological deficits in dyslexics should be attributed to (a) less specified representations of speech sounds, like suggested by studies in young children with a familial risk for dyslexia, or (b) to an impaired access to these phonemic representations, as suggested by studies in adults with dyslexia. These conflicting findings are rooted in between study differences in sample characteristics and/or testing techniques. The current study uses the same multivariate functional MRI (fMRI) approach as previously used in adults with dyslexia to investigate phonemic representations in 30 beginning readers with a familial risk and 24 beginning readers without a familial risk of dyslexia, of whom 20 were later retrospectively classified as dyslexic. Based on fMRI response patterns evoked by listening to different utterances of /bA/ and /dA/ sounds, multivoxel analyses indicate that the underlying activation patterns of the two phonemes were distinct in children with a low family risk but not in children with high family risk. However, no group differences were observed between children that were later classified as typical versus dyslexic readers, regardless of their family risk status, indicating that poor phonemic representations constitute a risk for dyslexia but are not sufficient to result in reading problems. We hypothesize that poor phonemic representations are trait (family risk) and not state (dyslexia) dependent, and that representational deficits only lead to reading difficulties when they are present in conjunction with other neuroanatomical or—functional deficits.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the Research Council of KU Leuven (OT/12/044), the Research Foundation Flanders (G0920.12), postdoctoral grant of Maaike Vandermosten (Research Foundation Flanders) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Vidi‐Grant 452‐16‐004 to Milene Bonte).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherDevelopmental Sciencees_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectbeginning readerses_ES
dc.subjectdyslexiaes_ES
dc.subjectmultivariate fMRIes_ES
dc.subjectMVPAes_ES
dc.subjectphoneme representationses_ES
dc.subjectphonological deficites_ES
dc.titleBrain activity patterns of phonemic representations are atypical in beginning readers with family risk for dyslexiaes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltdes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14677687es_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record