dc.contributor.author | Martínez-López, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bagstad, K.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Balbi, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Magrach, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Voigt, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Athanasiadis, I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pascual, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Willcock, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Villa, F. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-23T17:38:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-23T17:38:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-02-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Science of the Total Environment: 650: 2325-2336 (2019) | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0048-9697 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/42876 | |
dc.description | Zach Ancona (U.S. Geological Survey, USGS) assisted with preparation of numerous datasets for use in ARIES. Support for Bagstad's time was provided by the USGS Land Change Science Program. Support for Voigt's time was provided by the USGS Sustaining Environmental Capital Initiative. We thank Lisa Mandle for constructive comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Appendix A | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | Scientists, stakeholders and decision makers face trade-offs between adopting simple or complex approaches when modeling ecosystem services (ES). Complex approaches may be time- and data-intensive, making them more challenging to implement and difficult to scale, but can produce more accurate and locally specific results. In contrast, simple approaches allow for faster assessments but may sacrifice accuracy and credibility. The ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services (ARIES) modeling platform has endeavored to provide a spectrum of simple to complex ES models that are readily accessible to a broad range of users. In this paper, we describe a series of five Tier 1 ES models that users can run anywhere in the world with no user input, while offering the option to easily customize models with context-specific data and parameters. This approach enables rapid ES quantification, as models are automatically adapted to the application context. We provide examples of customized ES assessments at three locations on different continents and demonstrate the use of ARIES' spatial multi-criteria analysis module, which enables spatial prioritization of ES for different beneficiary groups. The models described here use publicly available global- and continental-scale data as defaults. Advanced users can modify data input requirements, model parameters or entire model structures to capitalize on high-resolution data and context-specific model formulations. Data and methods contributed by the research community become part of a growing knowledge base, enabling faster and better ES assessment for users worldwide. By engaging with the ES modeling community to further develop and customize these models based on user needs, spatiotemporal contexts, and scale(s) of analysis, we aim to cover the full arc from simple to complex assessments, minimizing the additional cost to the user when increased complexity and accuracy are needed | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | AQUACROSS - Knowledge, Assessment, and Management for AQUAtic Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services aCROSS EU policies (AQUACROSS) (642317) | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | Zach Ancona (U.S. Geological Survey, USGS) assisted with preparation of numerous datasets for use in ARIES. Support for Bagstad's time was provided by the USGS Land Change Science Program. Support for Voigt's time was provided by the USGS Sustaining Environmental Capital Initiative. We thank Lisa Mandle for constructive comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/642317 | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | JA-1434 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject | Decision making | es_ES |
dc.subject | Economic and social effects | es_ES |
dc.subject | Knowledge based systems | es_ES |
dc.subject | Model structures | es_ES |
dc.subject | Semantics | es_ES |
dc.subject | Spatial variables measurement | es_ES |
dc.subject | ARIES | es_ES |
dc.subject | Cloud-based | es_ES |
dc.subject | Context-aware models | es_ES |
dc.subject | Multi Criteria Analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | Semantic Model | es_ES |
dc.subject | Ecosystems | es_ES |
dc.subject | artificial intelligence | es_ES |
dc.subject | decision making | es_ES |
dc.subject | ecosystem service modeling | es_ES |
dc.subject | multicriteria analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | numerical model | es_ES |
dc.subject | artificial intelligence | es_ES |
dc.subject | spatial analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | Conservation of Natural Resources | es_ES |
dc.subject | Ecosystem Models | es_ES |
dc.subject | Biological Spatial Analysis | es_ES |
dc.title | Towards globally customizable ecosystem service models | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | /© 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969718338737?via%3Dihub | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.371 | |
dc.contributor.funder | European Commission | |