dc.contributor.author | Grassi, G. | |
dc.contributor.author | House, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kurz, W.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cescatti, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Houghton, R.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Peters, G.P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sanz, M.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Viñas, R.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Alkama, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Arneth, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bondeau, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dentener, F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fader, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Federici, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Friedlingstein, P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jain, A.K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kato, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Koven, C.D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nabel, J.E.M.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nassikas, A.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Perugini, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rossi, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sitch, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Viovy, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wiltshire, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zaehle, S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-18T11:03:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-18T11:03:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Nature Climate Change 8(10): 914-920 (2018) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1758-678X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/44016 | |
dc.description.abstract | Achieving the long-term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement requires forest-based mitigation. Collective progress towards this goal will be assessed by the Paris Agreement s Global stocktake. At present, there is a discrepancy of about 4 GtCO 2 yr -1 in global anthropogenic net land-use emissions between global models (reflected in IPCC assessment reports) and aggregated national GHG inventories (under the UNFCCC). We show that a substantial part of this discrepancy (about 3.2 GtCO 2 yr -1 ) can be explained by conceptual differences in anthropogenic forest sink estimation, related to the representation of environmental change impacts and the areas considered as managed. For a more credible tracking of collective progress under the Global stocktake, these conceptual differences between models and inventories need to be reconciled. We implement a new method of disaggregation of global land model results that allows greater comparability with GHG inventories. This provides a deeper understanding of model inventory differences, allowing more transparent analysis of forest-based mitigation and facilitating a more accurate Global stocktake. (c) 2018, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Springer | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/776810 | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/GA603542 | |
dc.relation.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0283-x | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.title | Reconciling global-model estimates and country reporting of anthropogenic forest CO 2 sinks | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.rights.holder | (c) 2018, Springer Nature B.V. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41558-018-0283-x | |
dc.contributor.funder | European Commission | |