Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGimeno, T.E.
dc.contributor.authorMcVicar, T.R.
dc.contributor.authorO'Grady, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorTissue, D.T.
dc.contributor.authorEllsworth, D.S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-18T11:03:14Z
dc.date.available2020-06-18T11:03:14Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationGlobal Change Biology:24 (7) : 3010-3024 (2018)
dc.identifier.issn1354-1013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/44024
dc.description.abstractElevated atmospheric CO2 concentration (eCa) might reduce forest water-use, due to decreased transpiration, following partial stomatal closure, thus enhancing water-use efficiency and productivity at low water availability. If evapotranspiration (Et) is reduced, it may subsequently increase soil water storage ( S) or surface runoff (R) and drainage (Dg), although these could be offset or even reversed by changes in vegetation structure, mainly increased leaf area index (L). To understand the effect of eCa in a water-limited ecosystem, we tested whether 2 years of eCa (~40% increase) affected the hydrological partitioning in a mature water-limited Eucalyptus woodland exposed to Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE). This timeframe allowed us to evaluate whether physiological effects of eCa reduced stand water-use irrespective of L, which was unaffected by eCa in this timeframe. We hypothesized that eCa would reduce tree-canopy transpiration (Etree), but excess water from reduced Etree would be lost via increased soil evaporation and understory transpiration (Efloor) with no increase in S, R or Dg. We computed Et, S, R and Dg from measurements of sapflow velocity, L, soil water content (?), understory micrometeorology, throughfall and stemflow. We found that eCa did not affect Etree, Efloor, S or ? at any depth (to 4.5 m) over the experimental period. We closed the water balance for dry seasons with no differences in the partitioning to R and Dg between Ca levels. Soil temperature and ? were the main drivers of Efloor while vapour pressure deficit-controlled Etree, though eCa did not significantly affect any of these relationships. Our results suggest that in the short-term, eCa does not significantly affect ecosystem water-use at this site. We conclude that water-savings under eCa mediated by either direct effects on plant transpiration or by indirect effects via changes in L or soil moisture availability are unlikely in water-limited mature eucalypt woodlands. (c) 2018 John Wiley and Sons Ltd
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission; EucFACE is supported by the Australian Commonwealth Government in collaboration with the Western Sydney University (WSU). EucFACE was built as an initiative of the Australian Government as part of the Nation-building Economic Stimulus Package. TEG was funded by a research collaborative agreement between CSIRO and WSU within the CSIRO Flagship programme “Water for a Healthy Country” during this research, and funded by the IdEx programme of the Université de Bordeaux and a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Intra-European fellowship (Grant Agreement No. 653223) during manuscript preparation.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/653223
dc.relation.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14139
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleElevated CO2 did not affect the hydrological balance of a mature native Eucalyptus woodland
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder(c) 2018 John Wiley and Sons Ltd
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/gcb.14139
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record