Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStelzenmüller, V.
dc.contributor.authorColl, R.
dc.contributor.authorCormier, R.
dc.contributor.authorMazaris, A.D.
dc.contributor.authorPascual, P.
dc.contributor.authorLoiseau, C.
dc.contributor.authorClaudet, J.
dc.contributor.authorKatsanevakis, S.
dc.contributor.authorGissi, E.
dc.contributor.authorEvagelopoulos, A.
dc.contributor.authorRumes, B.
dc.contributor.authorDegraer, S.
dc.contributor.authorOjaveer, H.
dc.contributor.authorMoller, T.
dc.contributor.authorGiménez, J.
dc.contributor.authorPiroddi, C.
dc.contributor.authorMarkantonatou, V.
dc.contributor.authorDimitriadis, C.
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-13T11:05:53Z
dc.date.available2021-01-13T11:05:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT: 724: 138118 (2020)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/49734
dc.description.abstractEcosystem-based management requires an assessment of the cumulative effects of human pressures and environmental change. The operationalization and integration of cumulative effects assessments (CEA) into decision-making processes often lacks a comprehensive and transparent framework. A risk-based CEA framework that divides a CEA in risk identification, risk analysis and risk evaluation, could structure such complex analyses and facilitate the establishment of direct science-policy links. Here, we examine carefully the operationalization of such a risk-based CEA framework with the help of eleven contrasting case studies located in Europe, French Polynesia, and Canada. We show that the CEA framework used at local, sub-regional, and regional scales allowed for a consistent, coherent, and transparent comparison of complex assessments. From our analysis, we pinpoint four emerging issues that, if accurately addressed, can improve the take up of CEA outcomes by management: 1) framing of the CEA context and defining risk criteria; 2) describing the roles of scientists and decision-makers; 3) reducing and structuring complexity; and 4) communicating uncertainty. Moreover, with a set of customized tools we describe and analyze for each case study the nature and location of uncertainty as well as trade-offs regarding available knowledge and data used for the CEA. Ultimately, these tools aid decision-makers to recognize potential caveats and repercussions of management decisions. One key recommendation is to differentiate CEA processes and their context in relation to governance advice, marine spatial planning or regulatory advice. We conclude that future research needs to evaluate how effective management measures are in reducing the risk of cumulative effects. Changing governance structures takes time and is often difficult, but we postulate that well-framed and structured CEA can function as a strategic tool to integrate ecosystem considerations across multiple sectorial policies. © 2020es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article is a product of the working group on cumulative effects assessment under the framework of COST Action 15121 ?Advancing marine conservation in the European and contiguous seas? (MarCons; http://www.marcons-cost.eu; (Katsanevakis et al. 2017)?supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology, CA15121). Special thanks to Nicole Stollberg who helped to develop high quality figures. Further, we thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENTes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/CA15121es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectConcrete pavementses_ES
dc.subjectEconomic and social effectses_ES
dc.subjectEcosystemses_ES
dc.subjectRisk analysises_ES
dc.subjectRisk assessmentes_ES
dc.subjectUncertainty analysises_ES
dc.subjectDecision making processes_ES
dc.subjectEcosystem-based managementes_ES
dc.subjectEffects assessmentes_ES
dc.subjectRisk criteriaes_ES
dc.subjectScience - policy interfaceses_ES
dc.subjectDecision makinges_ES
dc.subjectanthropogenic effectes_ES
dc.subjectdecision makinges_ES
dc.subjectecosystem managementes_ES
dc.subjectenvironmental changees_ES
dc.subjectmarine ecosystemes_ES
dc.subjectmarine environmentes_ES
dc.subjectrisk assessmentes_ES
dc.subjectCanadaes_ES
dc.subjectdecision makinges_ES
dc.subjectEuropees_ES
dc.subjectFrench Polynesiaes_ES
dc.subjecthumanes_ES
dc.subjectmarine environmentes_ES
dc.subjectreviewes_ES
dc.subjectrisk assessmentes_ES
dc.subjectuncertaintyes_ES
dc.subjectCanadaes_ES
dc.subjectEuropees_ES
dc.subjectFrench Polynesiaes_ES
dc.titleOperationalizing risk-based cumulative effect assessments in the marine environmentes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138118es_ES
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.