Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPérez Dasilva, Jesús Angel ORCID
dc.contributor.authorMeso Ayerdi, Koldobika
dc.contributor.authorMendiguren Galdospin, Terese
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T08:34:05Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T08:34:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-03
dc.identifier.citationMedia and Communication 9(1) : 301-312 (2021)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2183–2439
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/50487
dc.description.abstractThe term deepfake was first used in a Reddit post in 2017 to refer to videos manipulated using artificial intelligence techniques and since then it is becoming easier to create such fake videos. A recent investigation by the cybersecurity company Deeptrace in September 2019 indicated that the number of what is known as fake videos had doubled in the last nine months and that most were pornographic videos used as revenge to harm many women. The report also highlighted the potential of this technology to be used in political campaigns such as in Gabon and Malaysia. In this sense, the phenomenon of deepfake has become a concern for governments because it poses a short-term threat not only to politics, but also for fraud or cyberbullying. The starting point of this research was Twitter’s announcement of a change in its protocols to fight fake news and deepfakes. We have used the Social Network Analysis technique, with visualization as a key component, to analyze the conversation on Twitter about the deepfake phenomenon. NodeXL was used to identify main actors and the network of connections between all these accounts. In addition, the semantic networks of the tweets were analyzed to discover hidden patterns of meaning. The results show that half of the actors who function as bridges in the interactions that shape the network are journalists and media, which is a sign of the concern that this sophisticated form of manipulation generates in this collective.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherCogitatioes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectcybersecurityes_ES
dc.subjectdeepfakees_ES
dc.subjectfake newses_ES
dc.subjectNodeXLes_ES
dc.subjectsocial mediaes_ES
dc.subjectsocial network analysises_ES
dc.subjectTwitteres_ES
dc.titleDeepfakes on Twitter: Which Actors Control Their Spread?es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder2021 by the authors; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3433/3433es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.17645/mac.v9i1.3433
dc.departamentoesPeriodismoes_ES
dc.departamentoeuKazetaritzaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

2021 by the authors; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International License (CC BY).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as 2021 by the authors; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).