dc.contributor.author | Jiménez Pazos, Bárbara | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-12T16:25:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-12T16:25:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Metaphysica 19(2) : 185-200 (2018) | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 1874-6373 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/51361 | |
dc.description | VOR De Gruyter 05/06/2024 | |
dc.description.abstract | Although a detailed analysis of Darwin’s lexicon in On the Origin of Species has not been undertaken, critical literature claims that there are lexical signs of a teleological nature in the language used in this work. I intend to refute, through an analysis of the lexicon in Darwin’s work, the criticisms that claim a teleological subtext in Darwin’s language and that conceive said lan- guage to be a reflection of a teleological conception of nature. I will place special emphasis on the lexical material that Darwin uses in those paragraphs dedicated to the description of the function of Natural Selection. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | De Gruyter | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | teleology | es_ES |
dc.subject | nature | es_ES |
dc.subject | Darwin | es_ES |
dc.subject | Origin of Species | es_ES |
dc.subject | lexicon analysis | es_ES |
dc.title | The Deteleologization of Nature: Darwin’s Language in On the Origin of Species | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | © 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mp-2018-0009/html | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1515/mp-2018-0009 | |
dc.departamentoes | Filosofía | es_ES |
dc.departamentoeu | Filosofia | es_ES |