Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLavadinovic, Vukan M.
dc.contributor.authorIslas, Camila A.
dc.contributor.authorChatakonda, Murali Krishna
dc.contributor.authorMarkovic, Nevena
dc.contributor.authorMbiba, Monicah
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-02T09:05:38Z
dc.date.available2021-07-02T09:05:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-17
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers In Ecology And Evolution 9 : (2021) // Article ID 630990es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2296-701X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/52151
dc.description.abstractPoaching is a widespread activity that affects wildlife management goals and undermines conservation efforts worldwide. Despite its complexity, poaching is still commonly addressed by researchers as a one-dimensional phenomenon. To deepen the scientific understanding of poaching, we conducted a systematic literature review in the Web of Science and Scopus databases for the last 10 years, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. We found that most studies were carried out in Africa, although 43% of all articles on poaching were published by researchers from the United States and the United Kingdom. The most studied species are elephants (22%), rhinos (19%), wolves (9%), and bears (6%). Although this study identified a wide range of motives and drivers behind poaching activities, more than half of the analyzed articles do not attempt to provide a deeper understanding of this phenomenon. Its understanding of poaching usually does not go beyond the environmental impact of illegal hunting. Our study's potential limitations may relate to the focus on exclusively English-language articles and, among them, only those discussing mammal, bird, and reptile species. Our findings indicate that global scientific knowledge on poaching in the last 10 years is biased. There is an imbalance between the developed countries that mostly produce knowledge on poaching (usually from Northern America and Europe) and the developing countries commonly an object of interest. This bias is potentially challenging, as the global scientific knowledge on poaching comes from limited experience based on charismatic species and selective case studies. To overcome this gap and develop a deeper understanding of poaching, the scientific community needs to overcome this bias and address illegal hunting wherever it affects the environment and undermines conservation efforts.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectpoachinges_ES
dc.subjectwildlifees_ES
dc.subjectcharismatic specieses_ES
dc.subjectmotiveses_ES
dc.subjectdriverses_ES
dc.subjectsystematic reviewes_ES
dc.subjectPRISMA methodologyes_ES
dc.subjectwildlife conservationes_ES
dc.subjectnorth-southes_ES
dc.subjectbiodiversityes_ES
dc.subjecttrendses_ES
dc.subjectmilitarizationes_ES
dc.subjectTanzaniaes_ES
dc.subjecttradees_ES
dc.subjectworldes_ES
dc.titleMapping the Research Landscape on Poaching: a Decadal Systematic Reviewes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holderThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doaj.org/article/5422ca3ba53740718d0653ddcdd31b08es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fevo.2021.630990
dc.departamentoesQuímica analíticaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuKimika analitikoaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.