Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
dc.contributor.author | Fanari, Lorenzo ![]() | |
dc.contributor.author | Iradier Gil, Eneko ![]() | |
dc.contributor.author | Bilbao Barrenechea, Iñigo | |
dc.contributor.author | Cabrera, Rufino | |
dc.contributor.author | Montalbán Sánchez, Jon ![]() | |
dc.contributor.author | Angueira Buceta, Pablo ![]() | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T10:58:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T10:58:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-10-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sensors 21(21) : (2021) // Article ID 7209 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 1424-8220 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/54127 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents improvements in the physical layer reliability of the IEEE 802.11be standard. Most wireless system proposals do not fulfill the stringent requirements of Factory Automation use cases. The harsh propagation features of industrial environments usually require time retransmission techniques to guarantee link reliability. At the same time, retransmissions compromise latency. IEEE 802.11be, the upcoming WLAN standard, is being considered for Factory Automation (FA) communications. 802.11be addresses specifically latency and reliability difficulties, typical in the previous 802.11 standards. This paper evaluates different channel coding techniques potentially applicable in IEEE 802.11be. The methods suggested here are the following: WLAN LDPC, WLAN Convolutional Codes (CC), New Radio (NR) Polar, and Long Term Evolution (LTE)-based Turbo Codes. The tests consider an IEEE 802.11be prototype under the Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel and industrial channel models. The results suggest that the best performing codes in factory automation cases are the WLAN LDPCs and New Radio Polar Codes. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported in part by the Basque Government under Grant IT1234-19, in part by the PREDOC under Grant PRE2019_099407, and in part by the Spanish Government through project PHANTOM (MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE) under Grant RTI2018-099162-B-I00. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | MDPI | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MCIU/RTI2018-099162-B-I00 | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ | |
dc.subject | IEEE 802 | es_ES |
dc.subject | 11be | es_ES |
dc.subject | PHY layer | es_ES |
dc.subject | channel coding techniques | es_ES |
dc.subject | factory automation | es_ES |
dc.subject | industrial wireless networks | es_ES |
dc.title | Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.date.updated | 2021-11-11T14:57:45Z | |
dc.rights.holder | 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/21/7209/htm | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/s21217209 | |
dc.departamentoes | Ingeniería de comunicaciones | |
dc.departamentoeu | Komunikazioen ingeniaritza |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).