dc.contributor.author | Luthra, Sahil | |
dc.contributor.author | Saltzman, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Myers, Emily B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Magnuson, James S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-26T11:49:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-26T11:49:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Luthra, S., Saltzman, D., Myers, E.B. et al. Listener expectations and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability: A pre-registered replication. Atten Percept Psychophys 83, 2367–2376 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02317-x | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 1943-3921 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/55166 | |
dc.description | Published: 04 May 2021 | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | Researchers have hypothesized that in order to accommodate variability in how talkers produce their speech sounds, listeners
must perform a process of talker normalization. Consistent with this proposal, several studies have shown that spoken word
recognition is slowed when speech is produced by multiple talkers compared with when all speech is produced by one talker (a
multitalker processing cost). Nusbaum and colleagues have argued that talker normalization is modulated by attention (e.g.,
Nusbaum & Morin, 1992, Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure, pp. 113–134). Some of the strongest
evidence for this claim is from a speeded monitoring study where a group of participants who expected to hear two talkers
showed a multitalker processing cost, but a separate group who expected one talker did not (Magnuson & Nusbaum, 2007,
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33[2], 391–409). In that study, however, the sample size was small and the crucial
interaction was not significant. In this registered report, we present the results of a well-powered attempt to replicate those
findings. In contrast to the previous study, we did not observe multitalker processing costs in either of our groups. To rule out the
possibility that the null result was due to task constraints, we conducted a second experiment using a speeded classification task.
As in Experiment 1, we found no influence of expectations on talker normalization, with no multitalker processing cost observed
in either group. Our data suggest that the previous findings of Magnuson and Nusbaum (2007) be regarded with skepticism and
that talker normalization may not be permeable to high-level expectations. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This research was supported by NSF 1754284, NSF
IGERT 1144399 & NSF NRT 1747486 (PI: JSM) and NSF BCS
1554810 & NIH R01 DC013064 (PI: EBM). This research was also
supported in part by the Basque Government through the BERC 2018-
2021 program and by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación through
BCBL Severo Ochoa excellence accreditation SEV-2015-0490. SL was
supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Basque Government/BERC2018-2021 | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/SEV-2015-0490 | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.title | Listener expectations and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability: A pre-registered replication | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | # The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2021 | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.springer.com/journal/13414 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3758/s13414-021-02317-x | |