Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCortina-Segarra, J.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Sánchez, I.
dc.contributor.authorGrace, M.
dc.contributor.authorAndrés, P.
dc.contributor.authorBaker, S.
dc.contributor.authorBullock, C.
dc.contributor.authorDecleer, K.
dc.contributor.authorDicks, L.V.
dc.contributor.authorFisher, J.K.
dc.contributor.authorFrouz, J.
dc.contributor.authorKlimkowska, A.
dc.contributor.authorKyriazopoulos, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Mateos, D.
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-González, P.M.
dc.contributor.authorSarkki, S.
dc.contributor.authorVentocilla, J.L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T10:24:11Z
dc.date.available2022-03-17T10:24:11Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationRESTORATION ECOLOGY: 29 (4): e13346 (2021)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/55954
dc.description.abstractEcological restoration is key to counteracting anthropogenic degradation of biodiversity and to reducing disaster risk. However, there is limited knowledge of barriers hindering the wider implementation of restoration practices, despite high-level political priority to halt the loss of biodiversity. In Europe, progress on ecological restoration has been slow and insufficient to meet international agreements and comply with European Union Nature Directives. We assessed European restoration experts' perceptions on barriers to restoration in Europe, and their relative importance, through a multiple expert consultation using a Delphi process. We found that experts share a common multi-dimensional concept of ecological restoration. Experts identified a large number of barriers (33) to the advancement of ecological restoration in Europe. Major barriers pertained to the socio-economic, not the environmental, domain. The three most important being insufficient funding, conflicting interests among different stakeholders, and low political priority given to restoration. Our results emphasize the need to increase political commitment at all levels, comply with existing nature laws, and optimize the use of financial resources by increasing funds for ecological restoration and eradicate environmentally harmful subsidies. The experts also call for the integration of ecological restoration into land-use planning and facilitating stakeholders' collaboration. Our study identifies key barriers, discusses ways to overcome the main barriers to ER in Europe, and contributes knowledge to support the implementation of the European Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, and the EU 2030 Restoration Plan in particular. © 2021 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe are particularly thankful to experts participating in the Delphi process for their generosity in sharing their time and knowledge, and the European Chapter of the Society for Ecological Restoration (SERE), Réseau d'Échanges et de Valorisation en Écologie de la Restauration (REVER), Finnish Board on Ecological Restoration (FBER), Working Group on Ecological Restoration of the Spanish Association for Terrestrial Ecology (ER-AEET), Dutch Knowledge Network for Restoration and Management of Nature (OBN), German Restoration Network (GRN), UK Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (CIEEM), Portuguese Network of Ecological Restoration (RPRE), Iberian Center for River Restoration (CIREF), and European Federation of Soil Bioengineering (EFIB) for suggesting candidates to the consulting process. We appreciate the support given by BiodivERsA (project funded under the EU Horizon 2020 ERA-NET COFUND scheme), and the EKLIPSE project (European Union Horizon 2020 grant agreement 690474), and particularly by Juliette C. Young. JCS research is financially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Education and Universities and European Regional Development Funds (FEDER; project COSTERA, RTI2018-095954-B-I00). PMRG research is funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through FCT Investigator Program grant number IF/00059/2015, and Centro de Estudos Florestais is supported by FCT grants UID/AGR/00239/2019 and UIDB/00239/2020.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherRESTORATION ECOLOGYes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/RTI2018-095954-B-I00es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/690474es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectBiodiversity Strategy for 2030es_ES
dc.subjectBiodiversity Strategy to 2020es_ES
dc.subjectDelphi processes_ES
dc.subjectEU restoration planes_ES
dc.subjectEuropean Union Nature Directiveses_ES
dc.subjectpolitical prioritieses_ES
dc.titleBarriers to ecological restoration in Europe: expert perspectiveses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authors.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.13346es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/rec.13346
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Authors.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2021 The Authors.