Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNavinés, Ricard
dc.contributor.authorOriolo, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorHorrillo Furundarena, Igor ORCID
dc.contributor.authorCavero, Myriam ORCID
dc.contributor.authorAouizerate, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorSchaefer, Martin
dc.contributor.authorCapuron, Lucile ORCID
dc.contributor.authorMeana Martínez, José Javier ORCID
dc.contributor.authorMartín Santos, Rocío
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-02T11:59:56Z
dc.date.available2022-08-02T11:59:56Z
dc.date.issued2022-06
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 25(6) : 468-478 (2022)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1461-1457
dc.identifier.issn1469-5111
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/57158
dc.description.abstract[EN] Background The relationship between antidepressant response and glial, inflammatory, and metabolic markers is poorly understood in depression. This study assessed the ability of biological markers to predict antidepressant response in major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods We included 31 MDD outpatients treated with escitalopram or sertraline for 8 consecutive weeks. The Montgomery-angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was administered at baseline and at week 4 and 8 of treatment. Concomitantly, blood samples were collected for the determination of serum S100B, C-reactive protein (CRP), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL)-C levels. Treatment response was defined as >= 50% improvement in the MADRS score from baseline to either week 4 or 8. Variables associated with treatment response were included in a linear regression model as predictors of treatment response. Results Twenty-seven patients (87%) completed 8 weeks of treatment; 74% and 63% were responders at week 4 and 8, respectively. High S100B and low HDL-C levels at baseline were associated with better treatment response at both time points. Low CRP levels were correlated with better response at week 4. Multivariate analysis showed that high baseline S100B levels and low baseline HDL-C levels were good predictors of treatment response at week 4 (R(2 = )0.457, P = .001), while S100B was at week 8 (R-2 = 0.239, P = .011). Importantly, baseline S100B and HDL-C levels were not associated with depression severity and did not change over time with clinical improvement. Conclusions Serum S100B levels appear to be a useful biomarker of antidepressant response in MDD even when considering inflammatory and metabolic markerses_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank the consolidated research groups SGR2017/1798 (RMS) and the Centre for Biomedical Research in Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), Spain for their support. This work was supported by an "Emili Letang Premi Final de Residencia (2017)" grant (G.O.) from Fundacio Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford Universityes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectS100B proteines_ES
dc.subjectreactive-C proteines_ES
dc.subjectHDL-cholesteroles_ES
dc.subjectmajor depressiones_ES
dc.titleHigh S100B Levels Predict Antidepressant Response in Patients With Major Depression Even When Considering Inflammatory and Metabolic Markerses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Spain*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://academic.oup.com/ijnp/article/25/6/468/6530347?login=truees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ijnp/pyac016
dc.departamentoesFarmacologíaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuFarmakologiaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.