Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuarez Ajuria, Maria ORCID
dc.contributor.authorGallas , Mercedes ORCID
dc.contributor.authorGarcía García, Abel
dc.contributor.authorMarichalar Mendia, Xabier ORCID
dc.contributor.authorChamorro Petronacci, Cintia Micaela
dc.contributor.authorPadín Ireguas, María Elena
dc.contributor.authorPérez Sayáns, Mario ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-02T12:00:37Z
dc.date.available2022-08-02T12:00:37Z
dc.date.issued2022-07
dc.identifier.citationHead and Neck: journal for the sciences and specialties of the head and neck 44(7) : 1702-1714(2022)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1043-3074
dc.identifier.issn1097-0347
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/57159
dc.description.abstract[EN] The sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is highly protocolized in other cancers, however, this is not the case for oral squamous cell carcinoma patients, hence our objective was to evaluate the different protocols published. A specific study protocol was designed and subsequently registered on PROSPERO (Ref. CRD42021279217). Twenty-three articles were included in the meta-analysis. The grouped sensitivity of the SNB was 82% (95% CI: 0.74–0.88), and the grouped specificity was 100% (95% CI: 0.99–1.00). The use of other radiotracers other than pre-operative lopamidol showed higher values of sensitivity of 82.80% (95% CI: 76.90%–87.50%; p < 0.001). The use of the blue dye stain showed higher sensitivity values of 85.60% (95% CI: 71.90%–93.20%), compared to sensitivity values of 77.50% when it was not used (95% CI: 69.10%–84.20%) (p < 0.001). Diagnostic rates are variable and they were significantly better when 99mTc was used in all its variations and accompanied by the blue dye staining.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectblue dyees_ES
dc.subjectindocyanine greenes_ES
dc.subjectprotocolses_ES
dc.subjectsentinel node lymph biopsyes_ES
dc.subjectsystematic reviewes_ES
dc.titleEfficacy of different sentinel lymph node biopsy protocols in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Spain*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hed.27042es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hed.27042
dc.departamentoesEnfermeríaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuErizaintzaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2022 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.