Single-crown restorations in premolar-molar regions: short (<= 6.5) vs longer implants: retrospective cohort study
dc.contributor.author | Anitua Aldekoa, Eduardo | |
dc.contributor.author | Alkhraisat, Mohammad Hamdan | |
dc.contributor.author | Eguía del Valle, Asier | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-29T18:14:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-29T18:14:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Implant Dentistry 8 : (2022) // Article ID 40 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 2198-4034 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/58603 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose To compare the survival, changes in marginal bone level and prosthetic complications rate of short (<= 6.5 mm) and longer implants (>= 7.5) supporting a single-crown restoration in the maxillary/mandibular premolar or molar region. Methods This cohort study was conducted following the STROBE statement recommendations for observational studies. Clinical outcomes of 88 short implants in 78 patients and 88 long implants in 88 patients were examined. All the implants had been placed by the same surgeon and restored following the same prosthetic concept; using a transepithelial abutment (intermediate abutment) and a screw retained restoration. Results All the implants were in function after the follow-up period since insertion (median: 31 months; range 11 to 84 for SiG vs median: 35 months; range: 6-117 for CG; p = 0.139). No statistical differences (p = 0.342) were observed related to prosthetic complications (screw loosening 2/88 vs 5/88 CG, ceramic chipping 1/88 vs 0/88, temporary crown resin chipping 1/88 vs 0/88 for SiG and CG, respectively) or related to marginal bone level (Mesial or Distal MBL >= 2 mm in 1/88 implants for SiG vs 3/88 for CG; p = 0.312). Conclusions Within the limitations of this study, no survival differences have been observed between short implants and longer implants in single-crown restorations in posterior maxilla/mandible. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Springer | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject | dental implants | es_ES |
dc.subject | short implants | es_ES |
dc.subject | marginal bone loss | es_ES |
dc.subject | crown-to-implant ratio | es_ES |
dc.title | Single-crown restorations in premolar-molar regions: short (<= 6.5) vs longer implants: retrospective cohort study | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | Atribución 3.0 España | * |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://journalimplantdent.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40729-022-00438-y | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s40729-022-00438-y | |
dc.departamentoes | Estomatología II | es_ES |
dc.departamentoeu | Estomatologia II | es_ES |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the
original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or
other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line
to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this
licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/