Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEtxegarai Azkarategi, Garazi
dc.contributor.authorZapirain Zuazo, Irati
dc.contributor.authorCamblong Ruiz, Aritza ORCID
dc.contributor.authorUgartemendia de la Iglesia, Juan José ORCID
dc.contributor.authorHernández, Juan
dc.contributor.authorCurea, Octavian
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T16:52:14Z
dc.date.available2022-12-20T16:52:14Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-28
dc.identifier.citationApplied Sciences 12(23) : (2022) // Article ID 12171es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/58954
dc.description.abstractThe existing trend towards increased penetration of renewable energies in the traditional grid, and the intermittent nature of the weather conditions on which these energy sources depend, make the development of tools for the forecasting of renewable energy production more necessary than ever. Likewise, the prediction of the energy generated in these renewable production plants is key to the implementation of efficient Energy Management Systems (EMS) in buildings. These will aim both to increase the energy efficiency of the building itself, as well as to encourage self-consumption or, where appropriate, collective self-consumption (CSC). This paper presents a comparison between four different models, the former one being an analytical model and the remaining three machine learning (ML) based models. All of them will forecast the photovoltaic (PV) production curve for the next day. In order to validate these models, a case study of a PV system installed on the roof of a university building located in Bidart (France) is proposed. The model that most accurately forecasts the PV production during the period of July 2021 is the support vector regression (SVR), which has a mean R2 of 0.934 for July, being 0.97 on sunny days and 0.85 on cloudy ones. This is an improvement of 5.14%, 4.07%, and 4.18% over the nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous inputs (NARX), feedforward neural network (FFNN), and analytical model, respectively.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research study carried out in the frame of the EKATE project has been supported by the FEDER Interreg POCTEFA program.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectPV production forecastinges_ES
dc.subjectartificial intelligencees_ES
dc.subjectmachine learninges_ES
dc.subjectfeedforward neural networkes_ES
dc.subjectsupport vector regressiones_ES
dc.subjectnonlinear autoregressive exogenouses_ES
dc.subjectOpenModelicaes_ES
dc.subjectanalytical modeles_ES
dc.titlePhotovoltaic Energy Production Forecasting in a Short Term Horizon: Comparison between Analytical and Machine Learning Modelses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.date.updated2022-12-09T20:23:08Z
dc.rights.holder© 2022 by the authors.Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/23/12171es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app122312171
dc.departamentoesIngeniería eléctrica
dc.departamentoesIngeniería de sistemas y automática
dc.departamentoeuIngeniaritza elektrikoa
dc.departamentoeuSistemen ingeniaritza eta automatika


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 by the authors.Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2022 by the authors.Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).