dc.contributor.author | Langemeyer, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Palomo, I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Baraibar, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gómez-Baggethun, E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-26T07:51:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-26T07:51:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ecosystem Services: 30: 49-60-60 (2018) | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 2212-0416 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/61219 | |
dc.description.abstract | Ongoing ecosystem alterations underscore the need for ecosystem service assessment to urgently enter policy-making. Participatory methods and a systematic inclusion of stakeholders are crucial yet underdeveloped cornerstones of environmental decision making. This study aims at conducting a transparent and legitimized integrated assessment of ecosystem services that rigorously involves stakeholder knowledge and values in environmental decision making. To this end, participatory multi-criteria decision aid was applied to the case of declining vineyard ecosystems surrounding the National Park of Doñana in south-west Spain. Data was gained by means of a survey (n = 178), interviews (n = 21), and three stakeholder workshops (each with 15 21 participants). We found that stakeholder engagement improved all steps of decision making, including problem structuring, policy evaluation, and operationalization. Our results thereby reinforce two major arguments for adopting participatory methods in integrated ecosystem service assessments: (1) the inclusion of stakeholders and their objectives adds legitimacy to decision making; (2) the integration of stakeholder knowledge provides important information for decision making. © 2018 Elsevier B.V. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | We especially thank all the participants of the workshops, Ana Villa, and Jesús Mateos and the Fundación Doñana 21 and all others who facilitated our field work. We would also like to thank the unknown reviewers for their detailed and encouraging remarks and D. Wedgewood for his edits. This research was funded by European Commission project OpenNESS (FP7-Grant agreement: 308428308428 ), by a Juan de la Cierva Formación grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness to I.P. and by a grant of the talent development program of the Norwegian University of Life Sciences ( NMBU ) to E.G.B.. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Ecosystem Services | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/308428308428 | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject | Doñana | es_ES |
dc.subject | Ecosystem services stewardship | es_ES |
dc.subject | Integrated valuation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Local ecological knowledge | es_ES |
dc.subject | Multi-criteria evaluation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Participatory decision making | es_ES |
dc.title | Participatory multi-criteria decision aid: Operationalizing an integrated assessment of ecosystem services | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España | * |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.012 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.012 | |
dc.contributor.funder | European Commission | |