Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZvěřinová, I.
dc.contributor.authorMáca, V.
dc.contributor.authorŠčasný, M.
dc.contributor.authorStrube, R.
dc.contributor.authorMarques, S.
dc.contributor.authorDubová, D.
dc.contributor.authorKryl, M.
dc.contributor.authorCraveiro, D.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, T.
dc.contributor.authorChiabai, A.
dc.contributor.authorde Jalón, S. G.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-15T11:40:52Z
dc.date.available2023-06-15T11:40:52Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-20
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health: 17 (17): 1-23-23 (2020)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/61393
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to understand public preferences for several future scenarios of achieving a healthier, more equitable and sustainable Europe, which differ in the way the society is organized (individualistically vs. collectively) and in the driving sector (public vs. private). To achieve this aim, we conducted a questionnaire survey using representative samples for five European countries in 2018. About three thousand respondents chose among the four scenarios presented within four different contexts (green spaces, active mobility, energy-efficient housing, food consumption) or none of them. A majority of people in the five European countries were ready to accept one of the scenarios. We found significant differences in preferences according to socioeconomic backgrounds and values of respondents. People above 35 years old, those who were less educated, and those in the lowest household income tertile were less supportive of all scenarios. The heterogeneity in preferences associated with differences in socioeconomic backgrounds was larger for the scenario in which society is organized individualistically and driven by the private sector. Smaller distinctions were found in case of the scenario in which society is organized collectively and is driven by the public sector. Departing from social psychological theories, we examine the role of altruistic, biospheric, egoistic, hedonic, and security values. People with stronger biospheric values were more likely to accept scenarios, particularly those which are driven by the public sector and where there is more collective organisation. Those with a more egoistic value orientation were more likely to have higher preferences for scenarios where the private sector had a dominant role. The policy implications, in terms of the selection and framing of policy measures to enhance public support, are discussed. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe survey was developed in the scope of the INHERIT project (www.inherit.eu) funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 667364. Data analysis was supported by the FE3M project funded by the EXPRO programme of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic under grant agreement No. 19-26812X.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/667364es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectActive mobilityes_ES
dc.subjectEquityes_ES
dc.subjectFood consumptiones_ES
dc.subjectFuture scenarioses_ES
dc.subjectGreen spaceses_ES
dc.subjectHousinges_ES
dc.subjectPolicy supportes_ES
dc.subjectPublic acceptabilityes_ES
dc.subjectPublic healthes_ES
dc.subjectSustainabilityes_ES
dc.subjectValueses_ES
dc.titleHow to achieve a healthier and more sustainable europe by 2040 according to the public? Results of a five-country questionnaire surveyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2020, The Author(s).es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176071es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph17176071


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020, The Author(s).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020, The Author(s).