Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGardner, A.
dc.contributor.authorJiang, M.
dc.contributor.authorEllsworth, D.S.
dc.contributor.authorMacKenzie, A.R.
dc.contributor.authorPritchard, J.
dc.contributor.authorBader, M.K.F.
dc.contributor.authorBarton, C.V.M.
dc.contributor.authorBernacchi, C.
dc.contributor.authorCalfapietra, C.
dc.contributor.authorCrous, K.Y.
dc.contributor.authorDusenge, M.E.
dc.contributor.authorGimeno, T.E.
dc.contributor.authorHall, M.
dc.contributor.authorLamba, S.
dc.contributor.authorLeuzinger, S.
dc.contributor.authorUddling, J.
dc.contributor.authorWarren, J.
dc.contributor.authorWallin, G.
dc.contributor.authorMedlyn, B.E.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T07:20:04Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T07:20:04Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationNew Phytologist: 237 (4): 1229-1241 (2023)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/61417
dc.description.abstractOptimal stomatal theory predicts that stomata operate to maximise photosynthesis (Anet) and minimise transpirational water loss to achieve optimal intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE). We tested whether this theory can predict stomatal responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 (eCO2), and whether it can capture differences in responsiveness among woody plant functional types (PFTs). We conducted a meta-analysis of tree studies of the effect of eCO2 on iWUE and its components Anet and stomatal conductance (gs). We compared three PFTs, using the unified stomatal optimisation (USO) model to account for confounding effects of leaf–air vapour pressure difference (D). We expected smaller gs, but greater Anet, responses to eCO2 in gymnosperms compared with angiosperm PFTs. We found that iWUE increased in proportion to increasing eCO2 in all PFTs, and that increases in Anet had stronger effects than reductions in gs. The USO model correctly captured stomatal behaviour with eCO2 across most datasets. The chief difference among PFTs was a lower stomatal slope parameter (g1) for the gymnosperm, compared with angiosperm, species. Land surface models can use the USO model to describe stomatal behaviour under changing atmospheric CO2 conditions.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipAG gratefully acknowledges a studentship provided by the John Horseman Trust and the University of Birmingham. The BIFoR FACE facility is supported by the JABBS Foundation, the University of Birmingham and the John Horseman Trust. ARMK acknowledges support from the UK Natural Environment Research Council through grant NE/S015833/1. MJ and BEM acknowledge funding from the Australian Research Council (DE210101654, FL190100003).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherNew Phytologistes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectclimate changees_ES
dc.subjectdeciduouses_ES
dc.subjectevergreenes_ES
dc.subjectfree-air CO enrichment 2es_ES
dc.subjectphotosynthesises_ES
dc.subjectwater-use efficiencyes_ES
dc.titleOptimal stomatal theory predicts CO<inf>2</inf> responses of stomatal conductance in both gymnosperm and angiosperm treeses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2022 New Phytologist Foundation.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18618es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nph.18618


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

© 2022 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2022 New Phytologist Foundation.
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2022 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2022 New Phytologist Foundation.