Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKoasidis, K.
dc.contributor.authorNikas, A.
dc.contributor.authorKaramaneas, A.
dc.contributor.authorSaulo, M.
dc.contributor.authorTsipouridis, I.
dc.contributor.authorCampagnolo, L.
dc.contributor.authorGambhir, A.
dc.contributor.authorVan de Ven, D.J.
dc.contributor.authorMcWilliams, B.
dc.contributor.authorDoukas, H.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-27T14:47:42Z
dc.date.available2023-06-27T14:47:42Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationEnergy for Sustainable Development: 68: 457-471 (2022)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/61751
dc.description.abstractThe Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development embody highly intertwined targets to act for climate in conjunction with sustainable development. This, however, entails different meanings and challenges across the world. Kenya, in particular, needs to address serious sustainability threats, like poverty and lack of modern and affordable energy access. This study uses a multi-criteria group decision aid and consensus measuring framework, to integrate both agendas, and engages with Kenyan stakeholders to help inform future mitigation research and policy in the country. Results showed that stakeholders highlight topics largely underrepresented in model-based mitigation analysis, such as biodiversity preservation and demand-side transformations, while pointing to gaps in cross-sectoral policies in relation to access to modern energy, agriculture, life on land, and climate change mitigation. With numerous past and recent policies aiming at these issues, persistent stakeholder concerns over these topics hint at limited success. Sectoral and technological priorities only recently emphasised in Kenyan policy efforts are also correlated with stakeholders' concerns, highlighting that progress is not only a matter of legislation, but also of coordination, consistency of targets, and comprehensibility. Higher bias is found among the preferences of stakeholders coming from the country's private sector. Results from this exercise can inform national policymakers on effectively reshaping the future direction of the country, as well as modelling efforts aimed at underpinning Kenya's energy, climate and sustainable development policy. © 2022 The Authorses_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the H2020 European Commission Project “PARIS REINFORCE,” under grant Agreement No. 820846 . The sole responsibility for the content of this paper lies with the authors; the paper does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Commission.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherEnergy for Sustainable Developmentes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/820846es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectClimate co-governancees_ES
dc.subjectClimate policyes_ES
dc.subjectMulti-criteria decision aides_ES
dc.subjectSectoral decarbonisationes_ES
dc.subjectSustainable development goalses_ES
dc.titleClimate and sustainability co-governance in Kenya: A multi-criteria analysis of stakeholders' perceptions and consensuses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authors.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2022.05.003es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.esd.2022.05.003
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Authors.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2022 The Authors.