Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMilligan, Sara
dc.contributor.authorAntúnez, Martín
dc.contributor.authorBarber, Horacio A.
dc.contributor.authorSchotter, Elizabeth R.
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-20T09:44:52Z
dc.date.available2023-12-20T09:44:52Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationMilligan S, Antúnez M, Barber HA, Schotter ER. Are eye movements and EEG on the same page?: A coregistration study on parafoveal preview and lexical frequency. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jan;152(1):188-210. doi: 10.1037/xge0001278. Epub 2022 Sep 15. PMID: 36107695.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
dc.identifier.issn0096-3445
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/63438
dc.descriptionpublished Online: September 15, 2022es_ES
dc.description.abstractReaders extract visual and linguistic information not only from fixated words but also upcoming parafoveal words to introduce new input efficiently into the language processing pipeline. The lexical frequency of upcoming words and similarity with subsequent foveal information both influence the amount of time people spend once they fixate the word foveally. However, it is unclear from eye movements alone the extent to which parafoveal word processing, and the integration of that word with foveally obtained information, continues after saccade plans have been initiated. To investigate the underlying neural processes involved in word recognition after saccade planning, we coregistered electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye movements during a gaze-contingent display change paradigm. We orthogonally manipulated the frequency of the parafoveal and foveal words and measured fixation related potentials (FRPs) upon foveal fixation. Eye movements showed primarily an effect of preview frequency, suggesting that saccade planning is based on the familiarity of the parafoveal input. FRPs, on the other hand, demonstrated a disruption in downstream processing when parafoveal and foveal input differed, but only when the parafoveal word was high frequency. These findings demonstrate that lexical processing continues after the eyes have moved away from a word and that eye movements and FRPs provide distinct but complementary accounts about oculomotor behavior and neural processing that cannot be obtained from either method in isolation. Furthermore, these findings put constraints on models of reading by suggesting that lexical processes that occur before an eye movement program is initiated are qualitatively different from those that occur afterward.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was partially funded by the Spanish government (FPIMINECO Predoctoral Grant BES-2017-081797) and the society of Spanish scientists in United States (ECUSA; Fostering Grads mentorship program). Data from this study have been presented at the 2021 Psychonomic Society Annual Meeting and a departmental colloquium in the Department of Psychology at the University of South Florida. The data that support the findings of this study, the full sentence stimuli, and the code used for analyses, are available at https://osf.io/jkhvw/.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAPAes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/BES-2017-081797es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectlexical frequencyes_ES
dc.subjectparafoveal processinges_ES
dc.subjectFRPses_ES
dc.subjecteye movements in readinges_ES
dc.titleAre Eye Movements and EEG on the Same Page?: A Coregistration Study on Parafoveal Preview and Lexical Frequencyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holderThis document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadlyes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/xgees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/xge0001278


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record