Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBidegain Cancer, Gorka
dc.contributor.authorBárcena, Javier
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorJuanes, José Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-18T19:04:56Z
dc.date.available2024-01-18T19:04:56Z
dc.date.issued2014-11-22
dc.identifier.citationEstuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 152 : 162-172 (2015)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0272-7714
dc.identifier.issn10.1016/j.ecss.2014.11.018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/64115
dc.description.abstractIn several European estuaries, the introduced Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) has become a widespread and predominating species supplanting the native carpet shell clam (Ruditapes decussatus) whereas in other estuaries such as the Bay of Santander (Gulf of Biscay) this pattern has not been detected. Using this estuary as a case study, the potential coexistence/predominance patterns between these two species were explored with the objective of providing insight into the capacity of expansion of R. philippinarum. Firstly, the Ecological Niche Factor Analysis (ENFA) was applied to determine the niches of both species, using seven contemporary environmental variables, i.e. salinity, water depth, current velocity, and sediment sand, gravel, silt and organic matter content. Secondly, ENFA-derived habitat-suitability (HS) maps were simultaneously treated, using geospatial techniques and following HS index-based criteria, to determine the potential distribution patterns. Both species models performed well according to the cross-validation evaluation method. The environmental variables that most determined the presence of both clams were depth, current velocity and salinity. ENFA factors showed that R. philippinarum habitat differs more from the mean environmental conditions over the estuary (i.e. higher marginality) and has less narrow requirements (i.e. lower specialization). R. philippinarum dominated areas, determined by relatively lower current velocities and percentages of sand, higher organic matter contents and slightly shallower depths, were very reduced (i.e. 2.0% of the bay surface) compared to coexistence (47%) and R. decussatus predominance areas (7.4%). These results suggest that HS may regulate the expansion of R. philippinarum. ENFA, together with geospatial analysis of HS index, seems to be a valuable approach to explore the expansion potential of estuarine invasive or introduced species and thus support conservation decisions regarding native species.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.titlePredicting coexistence and predominance patterns between the introduced Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) and the European native clam (Ruditapes decussatus)es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder(c)2014 Elsevier Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadases_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771414003461es_ES
dc.departamentoesMatemática aplicadaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuMatematika aplikatuaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

(c)2014  Elsevier Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as (c)2014 Elsevier Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas