Gender inequality in household chores and work-family conflict
dc.contributor.author | Cerrato Allende, Francisco Javier | |
dc.contributor.author | Cifre, Eva | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-08T08:52:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-08T08:52:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-08-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Frontiers in Psychology 9 : (2018) // Article ID 1330 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-1078 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/64939 | |
dc.description.abstract | The fact that the permeability between family and work scopes produces work-family conflict (WFC) is well established. As such, this research aims to check whether the unequal involvement in household chores between men and women is associated with increased WFC in women and men, interpreting the results also from the knowledge that arise from gender studies. A correlational study was carried out by means a questionnaire applied to 515 subjects (63% men) of two independent samples of Spanish men and women without emotional relationship, who lived with their heterosexual partner. As expected, results firstly show unequal involvement in household chores by women and men as it is higher in women that in men, and the perception of partner involvement is lower in women that in men. Secondly, those unequal involvements relate differently to men and women on different ways of work-family interaction. They do not increase WFC in women comparing to men, although there are tangentially significant differences in work conflict (WC) and statistically significant in family conflict (FC). However, perception of partner involvement on household chores increases WFC both in men and in women but not WC nor FC. Nevertheless, increase on marital conflict (MC) by domestic tasks neither affect in a significant way WFC in women nor in men, but increase WC in both women and men and FC only in women. Results also confirm that subject involvement on household chores is not a significant predictor of WFC in women nor in men, and that MC by domestic tasks is a statistically significant predictor in women of WFC and FC, but not in men. Thus, results show that traditional gender roles still affect the way men and women manage the work and family interaction, although the increased WFC due to involvement in housework is not exclusive to women, but also occurs in men. Personal and institutional recommendations are made on the basis of these results to cope with these conflicts. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | Generalitat Valenciana (Grant AICO/2017/073). | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | gender inequality | es_ES |
dc.subject | work-family conflict | |
dc.subject | households | |
dc.subject | organizations | |
dc.subject | Gen Xers | |
dc.title | Gender inequality in household chores and work-family conflict | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | © 2018 Cerrato and Cifre. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01330 | |
dc.departamentoes | Psicología Social y Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento | es_ES |
dc.departamentoeu | Gizarte psikologia eta portaera zientzen metodologia | es_ES |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2018 Cerrato and Cifre. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.