dc.contributor.author | Lorenzo Ruiz, Iñigo  | |
dc.contributor.author | Arrizabalaga Arostegi, Haritz | |
dc.contributor.author | Gaztañaga Arantzamendi, Larraitz | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-08T16:43:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-08T16:43:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-03-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Heart Rhythm 20(4) : 644-645 (2023) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/65815 | |
dc.description.abstract | The high cost of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is the most significant barrier to the lack of treatment in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The literature suggests that reusing CIEDs is safe and could therefore be a cost-effective alternative for patients who do not have access to new devices | |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Heart Rhythm Society / Elsevier | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject | cardiac implantable electronic devices | |
dc.subject | patient | |
dc.subject | kKnowledge | |
dc.subject | opinions | |
dc.subject | views | |
dc.subject | reuse | |
dc.title | Knowledge, preferences of post-explant management and opinions towards reuse of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | © 2023. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271(23)00001-2/abstract | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.12.035 | |
dc.departamentoes | Enfermería I | |
dc.departamentoeu | Erizaintza I | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1556-3871 | |