Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLlamazares Martín, Andoni ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-09T09:31:05Z
dc.date.available2024-02-09T09:31:05Z
dc.date.issued2023-02
dc.identifier.citationHistoria 72(2) : 165-190 (2023)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0018-2311
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/65872
dc.description.abstractA new interpretation for the context of the lex Metilia (220) and the censorial involvement in the approval is offered. The regulation was approved at that time due to the recent conquest of Sardinia, from where one of the main detergents employed by fullers was imported. The censors’ intervention is connected to the administration of vectigalia: either some fullonicae in Rome were public property (or placed on public land), or, more probably, the Republic obtained revenue from quarries of fuller’s earth in Sardinia.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFranz Steiner Verlages_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectRoman Republices_ES
dc.subject3rd century B.C.
dc.subjectcensors
dc.subjectfullers
dc.subjectSardinia
dc.subjectpublic revenues
dc.titleThe lex Metilia fullonibus dicta and the production and trade of creta Sardaes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2022
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://biblioscout.net/article/10.25162/historia-2023-0007
dc.identifier.doi10.25162/historia-2023-0007
dc.departamentoesEstudios clásicos
dc.departamentoeuIkasketa klasikoak


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record