Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMongold, Scott J.
dc.contributor.authorGeorgiev, Christian
dc.contributor.authorLegrand, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorBourguignon, Mathieu
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-28T14:19:54Z
dc.date.available2024-05-28T14:19:54Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationScott J. Mongold, Christian Georgiev, Thomas Legrand, Mathieu Bourguignon eNeuro 15 December 2023, 11 (1) ENEURO.0384-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0384-23.2023es_ES
dc.identifier.citationeNeuro
dc.identifier.issn2373-2822
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/68223
dc.descriptionPublished on 15 December 2023es_ES
dc.description.abstractVoluntary motor control is thought to be predicated on the ability to efficiently integrate and process somatosensory afferent information. However, current approaches in the field of motor control have not factored in objective markers of how the brain tracks incoming somatosensory information. Here, we asked whether motor performance relates to such markers obtained with an analysis of the coupling between peripheral kinematics and cortical oscillations during continuous movements, best known as corticokinematic coherence (CKC). Motor performance was evaluated by measuring both gross and fine motor skills using the Box and Blocks Test (BBT) and the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT), respectively, and with a biomechanics measure of coordination. A total of 61 participants completed the BBT, while equipped with electroencephalography and electromyography, and the PPT. We evaluated CKC, from the signals collected during the BBT, as the coherence between movement rhythmicity and brain activity, and coordination as the cross-correlation between muscle activity. CKC at movements’ first harmonic was positively associated with BBT scores (r = 0.41, p = 0.001), and alone showed no relationship with PPT scores (r = 0.07, p = 0.60), but in synergy with BBT scores, participants with lower PPT scores had higher CKC than expected based on their BBT score. Coordination was not associated with motor performance or CKC (p > 0.05). These findings demonstrate that cortical somatosensory processing in the form of strengthened brain–peripheral coupling is specifically associated with better gross motor skills and thus may be considered as a valuable addition to classical tests of proprioception acuity.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipS.J.M. was supported by an Aspirant Research Fellowship awarded by the FRS-FNRS (Brussels, Belgium; Grant FC 46249). C.G. was supported by an Aspirant Research Fellowship awarded by the FRS-FNRS (Brussels, Belgium; Grant 1.A.211.24F). S.J.M., T.L., and M.B. were supported by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FRS-FNRS, Brussels, Belgium; Grant MIS F.4504.21).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSociety for Neurosciencees_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectEEGes_ES
dc.subjectgross motor skilles_ES
dc.subjectmotor controles_ES
dc.subjectproprioceptiones_ES
dc.subjectsensorimotor cortexes_ES
dc.titleAfferents to Action: Cortical Proprioceptive Processing Assessed with Corticokinematic Coherence Specifically Relates to Gross Motor Skillses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2024 Mongold et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.eneuro.org/es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1523/ENEURO.0384-23.2023


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record