Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Zabaleta, Hannot ORCID
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Erik
dc.contributor.authorSchuurbiers, Daan
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-10T11:43:16Z
dc.date.available2024-06-10T11:43:16Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-26
dc.identifier.citationResearch Policy 42(5) : 1126-1137 (2013)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0048-7333
dc.identifier.issn1873-7625
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/68384
dc.description.abstract[EN]As part of a larger trend across industrialized nations, European research policy discourse has placed increasing emphasis on socio-technical integration: the explicit incorporation of activities devoted to broader social aspects into scientific activities. In order to compare these high-level integration discourses against patterns at the level of resource allocation, we analyze nearly 2500 research solicitations from the three European Framework Programmes for R&D during the period 1998–2010. We identify four distinct types of integration (socio-ethical, stakeholder, socio-economic and industrial) that occur either as core or parallel components of R&D solicitations. Quantitative analysis reveals an overall trend towards increasing integration, with requests integrating industrial and socio-economic aspects substantially outnumbering those integrating socio-ethical and stakeholder aspects—by a 2 to 1 margin. Meanwhile, calls for socio-technical integration have become slightly more extensive (ranging across a broader range of research areas addressed), significantly more pervasive (shifting from the periphery to the core of R&D practices), and arguably less diverse (involving a wider variety of integration types) over time. The relative lack of attention to socio-ethical aspects and stakeholder participation in European research is particularly notable given that we focus on potentially controversial areas (life sciences, energy, and nanotechnology), which likely overemphasizes the prevalence of integration throughout the Framework Programmes.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipHannot Rodríguez's contribution is based on research supported by the Department of Education, Universities and Research of the Basque Government under a Postdoctoral Fellowship for the Improvement of Research Personnel in a Foreign Country (Ref. No.: BFI08.183; 2009–2010 2-year period). This research was primarily conducted at the Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes (CSPO), and the Center for Nanotechnology in Society (CNS), both at Arizona State University. Erik Fisher's contribution is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Award #0849101 and cooperative agreement #0531194. The authors would like to thank David Guston, participants at the “Science and Governance: Global and Comparative Perspectives” workshop at Arizona State University (April 2010) and the Science and Technology Policy Gordon Research Conference (August 2010), and an anonymous reviewer for helpful feedback and constructive criticism of earlier versions of this work. Any limitations and shortcomings of the work remain the responsibility of the authors.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectsocio-technical integrationes_ES
dc.subjectEU Framework Programmeses_ES
dc.subjectresearch solicitationses_ES
dc.subjectELSA (Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects)es_ES
dc.subjectstakeholder engagementes_ES
dc.subjectresponsible innovationes_ES
dc.titleIntegrating science and society in European Framework Programmes: Trends in project-level solicitationses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2013 Elsevier under CC BY-NC-ND licensees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733313000449es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.006
dc.departamentoesFilosofíaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuFilosofiaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2013 Elsevier under CC BY-NC-ND license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2013 Elsevier under CC BY-NC-ND license