Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez Ruiz, José Julio ORCID
dc.contributor.authorUrigüen Garaizabal, José Antonio
dc.contributor.authorLeturiondo Sota, Mikel ORCID
dc.contributor.authorSandoval, Camilo Leonardo
dc.contributor.authorRedondo Serrano, Koldo
dc.contributor.authorRussell, James Knox
dc.contributor.authorDaya, Mohamud Ramzan
dc.contributor.authorRuiz de Gauna Gutiérrez, Sofía ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-05T11:50:16Z
dc.date.available2024-08-05T11:50:16Z
dc.date.issued2024-07
dc.identifier.citationResuscitation 200 : (2024) // Article ID 110259es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0300-9572
dc.identifier.issn1873-1570
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/69143
dc.description.abstractBackground Interpretation of end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) during manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is affected by variations in ventilation and chest compressions. This study investigates the impact of standardising ETCO2 to constant ventilation rate (VR) and compression depth (CD) on absolute values and trends. Methods Retrospective study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases with manual CPR, including defibrillator and clinical data. ETCO2, VR and CD values were averaged by minute. ETCO2 was standardised to 10 vpm and 50 mm. We compared standardised (ETs) and measured (ETm) values and trends during resuscitation. Results Of 1,036 cases, 287 met the inclusion criteria. VR was mostly lower than recommended, 8.8 vpm, and highly variable within and among patients. CD was mostly within guidelines, 49.8 mm, and less varied. ETs was lower than ETm by 7.3 mmHg. ETs emphasized differences by sex (22.4 females vs. 25.6 mmHg males), initial rhythm (29.1 shockable vs. 22.7 mmHg not), intubation type (25.6 supraglottic vs. 22.4 mmHg endotracheal) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) achieved (34.5 mmHg) vs. not (20.1 mmHg). Trends were different between non-ROSC and ROSC patients before ROSC (–0.3 vs. + 0.2 mmHg/min), and between sustained and rearrest after ROSC (–0.7 vs. –2.1 mmHg/min). Peak ETs was higher for sustained than for rearrest (53.0 vs. 42.5 mmHg). Conclusion Standardising ETCO2 eliminates effects of VR and CD variations during manual CPR and facilitates comparison of values and trends among and within patients. Its clinical application for guidance of resuscitation warrants further investigation.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe grant PID2021-126021OB-I00 by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF/UE, and the grant IT1590-22 by the Basque Government financially supported this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN/PID2021-126021OB-I00es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectCPRes_ES
dc.subjectETCO2es_ES
dc.subjectventilation ratees_ES
dc.subjectcompression depthes_ES
dc.subjectcapnographyes_ES
dc.subjectROSCes_ES
dc.subjectprognosises_ES
dc.titleStandardisation facilitates reliable interpretation of ETCO2 during manual cardiopulmonary resuscitationes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957224001527es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110259
dc.departamentoesIngeniería de comunicacioneses_ES
dc.departamentoesMatemática aplicadaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuKomunikazioen ingeniaritzaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuMatematika aplikatuaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).