Long-term results of segmentectomy vs. lobectomy for c-stage IA lung cancer: A real-life study with a propensity score analysis based on a national cohort
View/Open
Date
2025-03-26Author
López, Iker
Aguinagalde Valiente, Borja
Ferrer Bonsoms, Juan A.
Sánchez, Laura
Ascanio, Fernando
Sesma, Julio
Recuero, José Luis
Fernández Monge, Arantza
Lizarbe, Ion Ander
Embún, Raúl
Metadata
Show full item record
Journal of Clinical Medicine 14(7) : (2025) // Article ID 2267
Abstract
The objective was to compare the results of segmentec
tomyandlobectomy in the treatment of c-stage IA lung cancer in terms of tumor recurrence
and 5-year survival. Methods: An observational study was performed using 3533 patients
included in the registry of the Spanish VATS Group (GEVATS) of the Spanish Society of
Thoracic Surgery (SECT) between 2016 and 2018. A total of 1004 lobectomies and 83 seg
mentectomies in c-stage IA were selected. Two comparable groups were selected through
2:1 propensity score matching with patient-, tumor- and surgery-related variables, leaving
166 lobectomies and 83 segmentectomies. Tumor recurrence was analyzed by Fisher’s test
and overall, cancer-specific, recurrence-free and disease-free survival by Kaplan-Meier and
Log-rank tests. Results: Overall recurrence was 23.7% in both groups, with a predominance
of locoregional recurrence in segmentectomy (16.2% vs. 11.2%) and distant recurrence in
lobectomy (12.5% vs. 7.5%). There was no difference between the two groups in any of the
survival types. Overall survival at 5 years was 73.5% (95% CI: 65.5–82.4%) in the lobectomy
group vs. 73.1% (95%CI: 60.1–88.9%) in the segmentectomy group. Conclusions: Anatomic
segmentectomy may be a valid option in the treatment of c-stage IA lung cancer since the
recurrence and long-term survival outcomes compared to lobectomy are equivalent