Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMendiola, Alaitz
dc.contributor.authorAstorga Burgo, Jasone ORCID
dc.contributor.authorJacob, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorHiguero Aperribay, María Victoria ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-31T13:32:11Z
dc.date.available2018-10-31T13:32:11Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-31
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 19(2) : 918-953 (2017)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1553-877X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/29429
dc.description.abstractSince the appearance of OpenFlow back in 2008, software-defined networking (SDN) has gained momentum. Although there are some discrepancies between the standards developing organizations working with SDN about what SDN is and how it is defined, they all outline traffic engineering (TE) as a key application. One of the most common objectives of TE is the congestion minimization, where techniques such as traffic splitting among multiple paths or advanced reservation systems are used. In such a scenario, this manuscript surveys the role of a comprehensive list of SDN protocols in TE solutions, in order to assess how these protocols can benefit TE. The SDN protocols have been categorized using the SDN architecture proposed by the open networking foundation, which differentiates among data-controller plane interfaces, application-controller plane interfaces, and management interfaces, in order to state how the interface type in which they operate influences TE. In addition, the impact of the SDN protocols on TE has been evaluated by comparing them with the path computation element (PCE)-based architecture. The PCE-based architecture has been selected to measure the impact of SDN on TE because it is the most novel TE architecture until the date, and because it already defines a set of metrics to measure the performance of TE solutions. We conclude that using the three types of interfaces simultaneously will result in more powerful and enhanced TE solutions, since they benefit TE in complementary ways.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission through the Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (GN4) under Grant 691567 Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under the Secure Deployment of Services Over SDN and NFV-based Networks Project S&NSEC under Grant TEC2013-47960-C4-3-Pes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherIEEEes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/691567es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/TEC2013-47960-C4-3-Pes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectsoftware-defined networkinges_ES
dc.subjecttraffic engineeringes_ES
dc.subjectnetwork resource optimisationes_ES
dc.subjectflow granularityes_ES
dc.titleA Survey on the Contributions of Software-Defined Networking to Traffic Engineeringes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/preprintes_ES
dc.rights.holder(c) 2017 IEEEes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7762818es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/COMST.2016.2633579
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission
dc.departamentoesIngeniería de comunicacioneses_ES
dc.departamentoeuKomunikazioen ingeniaritzaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

(c) 2017 IEEE
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as (c) 2017 IEEE