Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDíaz de Junguitu González de Durana, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorAllur Aranburu, Erlantz
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-08T11:28:05Z
dc.date.available2024-02-08T11:28:05Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-09
dc.identifier.citationSustainability 11(24) : (2019) // Article ID 7015es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/65622
dc.description.abstractThe adoption of environmental management systems (EMSs) based on standards such as ISO 14001 and EMAS (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme) has become very popular and the academic literature has studied the adoption of these standards extensively. However, the variety of ways in which EMSs are adopted and internalized has not been fully analyzed and the few studies that have analyzed this issue have focused on the analysis of the outcomes of just one of the main reference standards for EMSs, namely, ISO 14001. Considering this shortcoming in the literature, this work contributes to the empirical literature on the analysis of the adoption of standards for EMS by analyzing the case of the three main reference models used by organizations: ISO 14001, EMAS, and the alternative models for EMSs. The present work summarizes conclusions of interest for the di erent stakeholders involved in the adoption of EMSs. Implications for scholars and other stakeholders are discussed. It is recommended that further studies should focus on the analysis of the real e ects of the adoption of the main standards for EMSs.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the Basque Autonomous Government (Research Group GIC 15/176), grant number GIC 15/176; the project METASTANDARDS funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, the Spanish State Research Agency (AEI), and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) of the European Union: grant number PGC2018-098723-B-I00.
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICIU/PGC2018-098723-B-I00
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.subjectenvironmental management systemses_ES
dc.subjectISO 14001
dc.subjectEMAS
dc.subjectEkoscan
dc.titleThe Adoption of Environmental Management Systems Based on ISO 14001, EMAS, and Alternative Models for SMEs: A Qualitative Empirical Studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7015
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su11247015
dc.departamentoesEconomía aplicada Ies_ES
dc.departamentoeuEkonomia aplikatua Ies_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).