Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMei, Ning
dc.contributor.authorRahnev, Dobromir
dc.contributor.authorSoto, David ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-18T14:04:48Z
dc.date.available2024-04-18T14:04:48Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationMei, N., Rahnev, D., & Soto, D. (2023). Using serial dependence to predict confidence across observers and cognitive domains. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(4):1596-1608. Doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02261-xes_ES
dc.identifier.citationPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
dc.identifier.issn1069-9384
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/66770
dc.descriptionPublished online 7 March 2023es_ES
dc.description.abstractOur perceptual system appears hardwired to exploit regularities of input features across space and time in seemingly stable environments. This can lead to serial dependence effects whereby recent perceptual representations bias current perception. Serial dependence has also been demonstrated for more abstract representations, such as perceptual confidence. Here, we ask whether temporal patterns in the generation of confidence judgments across trials generalize across observers and different cognitive domains. Data from the Confidence Database across perceptual, memory, and cognitive paradigms was reanalyzed. Machine learning classifiers were used to predict the confidence on the current trial based on the history of confidence judgments on the previous trials. Cross-observer and cross-domain decoding results showed that a model trained to predict confidence in the perceptual domain generalized across observers to predict confidence across the different cognitive domains. The recent history of confidence was the most critical factor. The history of accuracy or Type 1 reaction time alone, or in combination with confidence, did not improve the prediction of the current confidence. We also observed that confidence predictions generalized across correct and incorrect trials, indicating that serial dependence effects in confidence generation are uncoupled to metacognition (i.e., how we evaluate the precision of our own behavior). We discuss the ramifications of these findings for the ongoing debate on domain-generality versus domain-specificity of metacognition.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipD.S. acknowledges support from the Basque Government through the BERC 2022-2025 program, from the Spanish State Research Agency, through the 'Severo Ochoa' Programme for Centres/Units of Excellence in R&D (CEX2020-001010-S). This project was funded by project grant PID2019-105494GB-I00 from the Spanish State Research Agency (DS). We thank Megan Peters and Alan Lee for the helpful feedback on a previous version of the manuscript.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSPRINGERes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GV/BERC2022-2025es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/CEX2020-001010-Ses_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/PID2019-105494GB-I00es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectConfidencees_ES
dc.subjectPerceptiones_ES
dc.subjectMemoryes_ES
dc.subjectMachine learninges_ES
dc.subjectMetacognitiones_ES
dc.titleUsing serial dependence to predict confidence across observers and cognitive domainses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2023es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/journal/13423es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/s13423-023-02261-x


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record